Prev: Where's our big bat?
Next: Zito the headcase
From: Duwop on 1 Aug 2010 13:32 On Aug 1, 4:24 am, Jim Garaventa <a...(a)b.com> wrote: > nomisnala wrote: > > > I'd say Bowker is something. > > I suppose so....if you think it's more important that Fresno wins a > championship instead of the SF Giants. BINGO.
From: John Walsh on 1 Aug 2010 13:45
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:02:48 -0700 (PDT), nomisnala <ariess(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >On Jul 31, 11:07�pm, John Walsh <jwalsh...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT), nomisnala >> >> >> >> >> >> <ari...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >On Jul 31, 4:12�pm, nomisnala <ari...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: >> >> They picked up a lefty reliever from the pirates.Martinez could become >> >> a starter for the pirates. �The right-handed sinker baller just needs >> >> some >> >> innings to get going in the big leagues. >> >> >Now its coming in that Bowker was part of that deal. I think >> >Sabean is nuts. �Martinez was too much for this 32 year old >> >quirky reliever. �Bowker could still be a very good major leaguer >> >if given a chance. � Fred Lewis is doing quite well, much better >> >than Aaron Rowand, almost as good as Andres Torres, �Frandsen >> >not doing too poorly, and now giving away Martinez was too much >> >for lopez, throwing in Bowker is insane, unless we get back Garrett >> >Jones? � Is Sabean trying to make amends for the Jason Schmidt >> >deal. �Sabean makes trades for spite. Not just good business. >> >The Molina deal gave him a reprieve but this deal, unless we are >> >missing part of the deal that hasn't been reported is nuts. >> >> He got a bit more than Martinez in the trades. �Nothing lost, possible >> one or two good arms gained. �- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > >I'd say Bowker is something. As my uncle Patrick once said, "He trade bait!" |