From: Dan C on
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:37:15 -0700, maaaack wrote:

> On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only which
>> would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, spam
>> and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would be the
>> same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If interested let
>> me know.
>
> I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.?

The rules are that you only get to post what "sweet lou" the Yank-fan
wants you to post. It's censorship at it's finest, which is right in
line with these Libtards ideas of how a gub'mint should be run, as well.

Avoid this kind of bullshit at all costs.

TRUTH!


--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
"Bother!" said Pooh, as he found Earl in his honey pot.
Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/
Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg
From: Gary on
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:36:52 -0400, "Ray OHara"
<raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"maaaack" <mark04051(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:74a3c69d-e5df-4498-9f8a-7e0ed303b1e1(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only
>> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls,
>> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would
>> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If
>> interested let me know.
>
>I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.?
>
>======================================================================
>
>censorship.
>


Bullshit.
From: Wayback1918 on
On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only
> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls,
> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would
> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If
> interested let me know.

I think I would.......
From: Ray OHara on

"Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:7fnn56ds3qb6d2bojfdurgpi1mspqb6769(a)4ax.com...
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:36:52 -0400, "Ray OHara"
> <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"maaaack" <mark04051(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:74a3c69d-e5df-4498-9f8a-7e0ed303b1e1(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>>On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote:
>>> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only
>>> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls,
>>> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would
>>> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If
>>> interested let me know.
>>
>>I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.?
>>
>>======================================================================
>>
>>censorship.
>>
>
>
> Bullshit.


that's what happens


From: mr. gone on
In article <80128298-ba64-4f1b-bf14-abde81beb918
@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, lounanmartel(a)aol.com says...
>
> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only
> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls,
> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would
> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If
> interested let me know.

my killfile works here - won't work there. so, if you're going to
include people like ofp, dun ce, ganork or muahmaggot there - no thanks.
those guys are sox fans (supposedly - though they strike me as being
fans of themselves only), which is why i bring them up.