From: Dan C on 5 Aug 2010 23:46 On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:37:15 -0700, maaaack wrote: > On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only which >> would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, spam >> and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would be the >> same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If interested let >> me know. > > I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.? The rules are that you only get to post what "sweet lou" the Yank-fan wants you to post. It's censorship at it's finest, which is right in line with these Libtards ideas of how a gub'mint should be run, as well. Avoid this kind of bullshit at all costs. TRUTH! -- "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". "Bother!" said Pooh, as he found Earl in his honey pot. Usenet Improvement Project: http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/ Thanks, Obama: http://brandybuck.site40.net/pics/politica/thanks.jpg
From: Gary on 6 Aug 2010 06:03 On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:36:52 -0400, "Ray OHara" <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >"maaaack" <mark04051(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:74a3c69d-e5df-4498-9f8a-7e0ed303b1e1(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote: >> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only >> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, >> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would >> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If >> interested let me know. > >I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.? > >====================================================================== > >censorship. > Bullshit.
From: Wayback1918 on 6 Aug 2010 06:37 On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote: > It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only > which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, > spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would > be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If > interested let me know. I think I would.......
From: Ray OHara on 6 Aug 2010 10:07 "Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:7fnn56ds3qb6d2bojfdurgpi1mspqb6769(a)4ax.com... > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 22:36:52 -0400, "Ray OHara" > <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >>"maaaack" <mark04051(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:74a3c69d-e5df-4498-9f8a-7e0ed303b1e1(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >>On Aug 5, 8:34 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote: >>> It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only >>> which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, >>> spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would >>> be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If >>> interested let me know. >> >>I would be interested too. What are the parameters/rules etc.? >> >>====================================================================== >> >>censorship. >> > > > Bullshit. that's what happens
From: mr. gone on 6 Aug 2010 10:23 In article <80128298-ba64-4f1b-bf14-abde81beb918 @k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>, lounanmartel(a)aol.com says... > > It would be a Google type like the Yanks group and by invite only > which would include 90 % of present folks but would eliminate trolls, > spam and political BS but would include all sports postings. It would > be the same as this NG but it would be for Boston/Sox fans. If > interested let me know. my killfile works here - won't work there. so, if you're going to include people like ofp, dun ce, ganork or muahmaggot there - no thanks. those guys are sox fans (supposedly - though they strike me as being fans of themselves only), which is why i bring them up.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: Which catcher will be brought up first ? Next: Clarification On Possible New NG |