Prev: AdjOPS team totals thru 10/3/09
Next: when was the last time you were at a pro game?
From: BTT on 12 Oct 2009 07:16
On Oct 12, 1:53 am, Giovanni Wassen <exta...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> RN wrote:
> > keep paps and bay away from the yankees.
>
> Why would the Yankees want Paps? Paps isn't very likely to enjoy a season
> or two in the setup role for Mo.
>
> --
Closer insurance, and to stick it to the Sox? They can afford to do
it.

BTT
STILL IN SHOCK!!

From: Tristan daCunha on 12 Oct 2009 08:41
BTT; What youse need is a "clean" team.

From: Dano on 12 Oct 2009 16:07
BTT wrote:
> On Oct 12, 1:53 am, Giovanni Wassen <exta...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> RN wrote:
>>> keep paps and bay away from the yankees.
>>
>> Why would the Yankees want Paps? Paps isn't very likely to enjoy a
>> season or two in the setup role for Mo.
>>
>> --
> Closer insurance, and to stick it to the Sox? They can afford to do
> it.
>
>
Why is anyone even talking about Paps to TEE? Couple of years before they
need worry about that. If Pap goes anywhere next year it will be in a
trade. It sure won't be to the MFY.


From: BTT on 12 Oct 2009 17:03
On Oct 12, 4:07 pm, "Dano" <janeandd...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> BTT wrote:
> > On Oct 12, 1:53 am, Giovanni Wassen <exta...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> RN wrote:
> >>> keep paps and bay away from the yankees.
>
> >> Why would the Yankees want Paps? Paps isn't very likely to enjoy a
> >> season or two in the setup role for Mo.
>
> >> --
> > Closer insurance, and to stick it to the Sox? They can afford to do
> > it.
>
> Why is anyone even talking about Paps to TEE?  Couple of years before they
> need worry about that.  If Pap goes anywhere next year it will be in a
> trade.  It sure won't be to the MFY.

I must be missing something. Cot's says that Paps is "signed through
2009"; the Red Sox media
guide says the same. Are they leaving out that he's still under Red
Sox control?

BTT
STILL IN SHOCK!!
From: PETER SHORTS on 12 Oct 2009 17:32
On Oct 12, 5:03 pm, BTT <BTTalbot2...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 4:07 pm, "Dano" <janeandd...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > BTT wrote:
> > > On Oct 12, 1:53 am, Giovanni Wassen <exta...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> RN wrote:
> > >>> keep paps and bay away from the yankees.
>
> > >> Why would the Yankees want Paps? Paps isn't very likely to enjoy a
> > >> season or two in the setup role for Mo.
>
> > >> --
> > > Closer insurance, and to stick it to the Sox? They can afford to do
> > > it.
>
> > Why is anyone even talking about Paps to TEE? Couple of years before they
> > need worry about that. If Pap goes anywhere next year it will be in a
> > trade. It sure won't be to the MFY.
>
> I must be missing something. Cot's says that Paps is "signed through
> 2009"; the Red Sox media
> guide says the same. Are they leaving out that he's still under Red
> Sox control?
>
> BTT
> STILL IN SHOCK!!

he gets arbitration, but he's not currently signed. he'll be signed
for another year after he goes through the arbitration process, unless
the sox agree to a contract before arbitration, which is likely.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: AdjOPS team totals thru 10/3/09
Next: when was the last time you were at a pro game?