Tyranny Around The Corner?
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
From: O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks. on 22 Jun 2010 23:43 "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx THE CHICAGO WAY!!! :D
From: John on 23 Jun 2010 09:44 "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprostate(a)aol.com> wrote in message news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that > a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a > private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he > deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." > > Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: > > http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx > > > THE CHICAGO WAY!!! > > :D > So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity and it really is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs.
From: John on 23 Jun 2010 09:54 "John" <johnswil21(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... > > "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprostate(a)aol.com> wrote > in message > news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that >> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a >> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he >> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." >> >> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: >> >> http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx >> >> >> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! >> >> :D >> > > > So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to > industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications along > the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing claims to > made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity and it really > is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. > Remember the Constitution also says provide for the general welfare in the preamble.
From: Ray OHara on 23 Jun 2010 09:59 "John" <johnswil21(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:CmoUn.111145$304.13305(a)newsfe12.iad... > > "John" <johnswil21(a)charter.net> wrote in message > news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... >> >> "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprostate(a)aol.com> wrote >> in message >> news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> >>> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that >>> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a >>> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he >>> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." >>> >>> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: >>> >>> http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx >>> >>> >>> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! >>> >>> :D >>> >> >> >> So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to >> industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications >> along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing >> claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity >> and it really is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. >> > > > Remember the Constitution also says provide for the general welfare in the > preamble. > it says that in aricle I section 8 under the scope of legislative power. and where does the Constitution say he can't. the teabaggers always yak about tje Constitution this and that but never exactly say what provision it violates/
From: CharlesGrozny on 23 Jun 2010 12:12 "John" <johnswil21(a)charter.net> wrote in message news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... > > "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprostate(a)aol.com> wrote > in message > news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that >> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a >> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he >> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." >> >> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: >> >> http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx >> >> >> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! >> >> :D >> > > > So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to > industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications along > the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing claims to > made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity and it really > is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. > Another f*cking Libturd. Listen, BP is responsible, of course, but under the due process of law, not the kind of Chicago Thuggery Nobama and company practice. He's NOT QUALIFIED to be President anyway. He was born in KENYA. Charles Grozny
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Prev: Lowell 6-22 Next: AdjOPS, National League, hit & pitch, through June 23rd |