Tyranny Around The Corner?
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
From: Tristan daCunha on 23 Jun 2010 19:23 Mario/Maria; The Queen of V.I. 812
From: Ray OHara on 23 Jun 2010 21:27 "Polarhound" <polarhound(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:9rvUn.30887$%u7.25601(a)newsfe14.iad... > Ray OHara wrote: >> "CharlesGrozny" <n5hsr(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:HvOdnRLbEtPFr7_RnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... >>> "John" <johnswil21(a)charter.net> wrote in message >>> news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... >>>> "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprostate(a)aol.com> >>>> wrote in message >>>> news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >>>>> >>>>> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that >>>>> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a >>>>> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he >>>>> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." >>>>> >>>>> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/Is-US-Now-On-Slippery-Slope-To-Tyranny-.aspx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! >>>>> >>>>> :D >>>>> >>>> >>>> So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to >>>> industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications >>>> along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing >>>> claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity >>>> and it really is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. >>>> >>> Another f*cking Libturd. >>> >>> Listen, BP is responsible, of course, but under the due process of law, >>> not the kind of Chicago Thuggery Nobama and company practice. >>> >>> He's NOT QUALIFIED to be President anyway. He was born in KENYA. >>> >>> Charles Grozny >> >> ano >> ther teagging birther troll >> >> > > Once again, Ray Chavez demonstrates that he never has facts, only insults. > Typical and predictable. so you defend birthers who write utter bullshit? good for you. and I was right, you would never address the fact your $2 billion loan by Obama to Brazil. that you'd just pretend you never made the initial posts. a word to the wise. before you post anything by Glenn Beck, do a net search first.
From: The Gnorkmeister on 24 Jun 2010 02:13 On Jun 24, 2:01 am, mario in victoria <mario5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Polarhound wrote: > > Ray OHara wrote: > >> "CharlesGrozny" <n5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>news:HvOdnRLbEtPFr7_RnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > >>> "John" <johnswi...(a)charter.net> wrote in message > >>>news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... > >>>> "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprost...(a)aol.com> > >>>> wrote in message > >>>>news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > >>>>> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that > >>>>> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a > >>>>> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he > >>>>> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." > > >>>>> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: > > >>>>>http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/... > > >>>>> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! > > >>>>> :D > > >>>> So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage > >>>> to industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological > >>>> ramifications along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people > >>>> actually filing claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about > >>>> personal responsiblity and it really is shame that were forced to > >>>> actulaay live up to theirs. > > >>> Another f*cking Libturd. > > >>> Listen, BP is responsible, of course, but under the due process of > >>> law, not the kind of Chicago Thuggery Nobama and company practice. > > >>> He's NOT QUALIFIED to be President anyway. He was born in KENYA. > > >>> Charles Grozny > > >> ano > >> ther teagging birther troll > > > Once again, Ray Chavez demonstrates that he never has facts, only > > insults. Typical and predictable. > > Possibly, but YOU invariably turn to insults (frequently first) if > someone disagrees with you. > > Perhaps you're typical and predictable, huh? > > mario in victoria > -- > read, repeat. research? huh?- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Hey Mario, You dog-lipped toad-faced, smelly vomit inducing cretin, I personally do not believe in insults, but you must admit that they are the mother's milk of the internet.
From: PETER SHORTS on 24 Jun 2010 08:28 On Jun 23, 9:59 am, "Ray OHara" <raymond-oh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "John" <johnswi...(a)charter.net> wrote in message > > news:CmoUn.111145$304.13305(a)newsfe12.iad... > > > > > > > "John" <johnswi...(a)charter.net> wrote in message > >news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... > > >> "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprost...(a)aol.com> wrote > >> in message > >>news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com.... > > >>> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that > >>> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a > >>> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he > >>> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." > > >>> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: > > >>>http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/.... > > >>> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! > > >>> :D > > >> So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to > >> industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications > >> along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing > >> claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity > >> and it really is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. > > > Remember the Constitution also says provide for the general welfare in the > > preamble. > > it says that in aricle I section 8 under the scope of legislative power. > > and where does the Constitution say he can't. > the teabaggers always yak about tje Constitution this and that but never > exactly say what provision it violates/ the president doesn't have legislative power.
From: Ray OHara on 24 Jun 2010 10:06
"PETER SHORTS" <petershrts(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2d6beca6-5214-4553-923d-d074c3eeddc3(a)w12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com... On Jun 23, 9:59 am, "Ray OHara" <raymond-oh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "John" <johnswi...(a)charter.net> wrote in message > > news:CmoUn.111145$304.13305(a)newsfe12.iad... > > > > > > > "John" <johnswi...(a)charter.net> wrote in message > >news:6doUn.2524$Yo5.245(a)newsfe01.iad... > > >> "O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks." <oneilsprost...(a)aol.com> > >> wrote > >> in message > >>news:5685f1cf-6f2b-4da5-98e4-fb5c6664af86(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > >>> "Just where in the Constitution of the United States does it say that > >>> a president has the authority to extract vast sums of money from a > >>> private enterprise and distribute it as he sees fit to whomever he > >>> deems worthy of compensation? Nowhere." > > >>> Read more from the obviously RAAACIST!!1! author here: > > >>>http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/537967/201006211813/... > > >>> THE CHICAGO WAY!!! > > >>> :D > > >> So what you're saying is that BP is not responsible for the damage to > >> industry, livlihoods, and the economics and ecological ramifications > >> along the Gulf Coast. Basically you are against people actually filing > >> claims to made whole. Conservatives talk about personal responsiblity > >> and it really is shame that were forced to actulaay live up to theirs. > > > Remember the Constitution also says provide for the general welfare in > > the > > preamble. > > it says that in aricle I section 8 under the scope of legislative power. > > and where does the Constitution say he can't. > the teabaggers always yak about tje Constitution this and that but never > exactly say what provision it violates/ the president doesn't have legislative power. ===================================================================== he didn't pass any legislation. nice try , but guess again. why don't you show us what provision he violated little pete. you want to weigh in, so now back up your teabagger claim. |