Tweet 7/31
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
Prev: Tweet 7/31
Next: Way to go big Papi
From: Dano on 31 Jul 2010 20:27 "Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:jbe956dgr8ego118p5su1v8gp6umu1dpbq(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:00:53 -0400, bismotwitter <bismo(a)ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > > >@Gary: My people tell me that Ellsbury is a virtual pariah in the > >clubhouse. No one wants him around, least of all Mr. Francona. > > And he might be playing against Cleveland next week. > > > "My people" again? His "thousands" of followers. Delusional...
From: Tristan daCunha on 31 Jul 2010 21:17 Bishole tells all; "Lavaranues Coles is always welcome on the Jets. I know he's lost 3 or 4 steps, but he's still tough as nails and good in the locker room". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ And I'll bet the ranch youse know, foist hand, just how good! Bis....we know youse is a Twink, but please keep the sordid details to yourself! Send a twitter to the Logo channel! Hurl!
From: McDuck on 31 Jul 2010 21:44 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:44:07 -0400, bismotwitter <bismo(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote: >@Dano: It is wishful, because I do want Ellsbury gone, but the plan is >to play him, restore some of his now-nil value, & dump him in winter. Wow! You were the guy who high as heaven on Ellsbury and promised us all he'd be a star. Now you hate him because he got bad medical advice from the RS. Odd, but I've stopped counting.
From: McDuck on 31 Jul 2010 21:49 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:24:08 -0400, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >"Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message >news:r6e956duhn7r0tetfa1hu4klidsk29gnhm(a)4ax.com... >> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 19:58:18 -0400, bismotwitter <bismo(a)ix.netcom.com> >> wrote: >> >> >@Gary: Sure, this result is good for Theo. He does indeed get not a >> >good, but great year, from Beltre. But he has no shot of keeping him. >> >> >> One year of Beltre is better than none. Any different deal and Beltre >> signs with Oakland instead last off-season. > >If they don't re-sign him, what have they lost? They got a great season at >a fair price. Beltre got to establish his true value. The Red Sox will at >the very least get two picks for losing him and still have whatever money he >would have cost (probably less) to replace him. Everyone should be happy >however it turns out. That's a smart GM. > Yes, we agree on something. The deal was a risk to the RS only if Beltre was terrible, which was highly unlikely unless he was injured. As it worked out, it could not be better for the RS. True, they MIGHT have gotten a bargain longterm contract, but that is not the Boras way. Beltre was confident in his abilities, and we see why. He is a really cheap near superstar right now.
From: JTibbs on 31 Jul 2010 23:55
"Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:2j69569sf5l41jukagqkkji0jlt8ukau03(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 17:23:02 -0400, bismotwitter <bismo(a)ix.netcom.com> > wrote: > >># Enjoy Ellsbury when he returns because--and you can take this to the >>bank--he won't be on Sox in 2011. Theo even tried to trade him today. > > > From what I heard that was not the case. Unfounded rumors, evidently. Yeah, I heard he told teams he was untouchable. |