Prev: Brent Dlugach
Next: Cortisone shot anyone ???
From: bismotwitter on 23 Jul 2010 18:59 @Dano: I agree. I'm no fan of Bautista. Gammons just thought it was interesting that Boston could've had him for a song (not Seung).
From: bismotwitter on 23 Jul 2010 19:00 @JTibbs: I agree 100% on the pen; I tweeted about that since the offseason. I felt it was a big issue that Theo didn't address.
From: bismotwitter on 23 Jul 2010 19:01 @JTibbs: I would've been fine with giving up a couple of C prospects for adequate players to better plug holes at C, 2B, probably OF too.
From: bismotwitter on 23 Jul 2010 19:02 @Gary: After all, if the Sox system is so deep, they should have plenty of reasonably attractive chits--and losing a few wouldn't hurt.
From: Gary on 23 Jul 2010 19:33
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:59:17 -0400, bismotwitter <bismo(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote: >@Gary: Gammons said Bautista deal was later in the season--I believe >it was August. I just tweeted it as interesting; I'm not mad about it. Whatever. He's not the type of player to go over the luxery tax for. |