From: David Short on 29 Apr 2010 14:18 On 4/29/2010 2:07 PM, Bob Braun wrote: > Dunn-Hamilton-Bruce should have been set for years!!!!!!!! It was said at > the time and repeated at every opportunity. It would have been a productive > outfield that was PLENTY affordable. > > If you are running those guys out there regularly, you could afford to let a > guy like Janish play every day. With Rolen, Phillips, Votto and > Hannigan....that's a pretty nice looking lineup. > > That's why I say the Cincinnati Reds have on one to blame but themselves. Really? You say the reds have on one to blame? I don't think that's what you say. But I could be wrong. dfs
From: tom dunne on 29 Apr 2010 20:36 On Apr 29, 6:23 pm, John Kasupski <w2...(a)spamfilter.verizon.net> wrote: > I don't want to re-open this argument. There's nothing new to be said. A team > like the Phillies can afford to have a guy in the middle of the lineup striking > out 200 or so times because they can afford to pay the salaries necessary to put > guys like Rollins, Victorino, etc. in the lineup around Ryan Howard - who > incidentally has a career .279 BA compared to Dunn's .249 - but teams like the > Reds can't afford to do that. Dunn is hitting .227 right now. His .267 last year > was a career high, his 177 strikeouts was not and he was a defensive butcher at > two positions. Just the kind of guy perennial losers tend to have on their > rosters and that's WHY they're perennial losers. Here are stats for two players, showing their average performances over a 162 game season. Player A: .249 avg/.383 obp/.518 slg, 40 homers, 97 RBI, career 132 OPS +, lead league in strikeouts 3 times. Player B: .262 avg/.356 obp/.490 slg, 32 homers, 98 RBI, career 139 OPS +, lead league in strikeouts 5 times. Which one is a Hall of Famer with 4 rings, and which one is the reason why his franchises are perennial losers? How can you tell the difference? Honest answers only, please - no looking up the names until after you submit your guess!
From: Bob Braun on 29 Apr 2010 20:37 "David Short" <David.No.Short.(a)Spam.wright.Please.edu> wrote in message news:hrcihd$vpe$1(a)posting.glorb.com... > On 4/29/2010 2:07 PM, Bob Braun wrote: >> Dunn-Hamilton-Bruce should have been set for years!!!!!!!! It was said >> at >> the time and repeated at every opportunity. It would have been a >> productive >> outfield that was PLENTY affordable. >> >> If you are running those guys out there regularly, you could afford to >> let a >> guy like Janish play every day. With Rolen, Phillips, Votto and >> Hannigan....that's a pretty nice looking lineup. >> >> That's why I say the Cincinnati Reds have on one to blame but themselves. > > Really? You say the reds have on one to blame? > > I don't think that's what you say. > > But I could be wrong. > > dfs When I get pissed I type fast and transpose letters.
From: john smith on 29 Apr 2010 21:59 guess Adam Dunn and Reggie Jackson?
From: tom dunne on 29 Apr 2010 22:38 On Apr 29, 9:59 pm, eddyg...(a)msn.com (john smith) wrote: > guess Adam Dunn and Reggie Jackson? You got it in one, John! Their career averages are very similar, and Reggie Jackson is actually the all-time strikeout leader in MLB history. He also made the playoffs 11 times, with three different franchises. Jackson shares the all-time strikeout top ten with Willie Stargell, Mike Schmidt and Tony Perez, each one a Hall of Famer and champion. Strikeouts are no fun to watch, but they really just don't mean anything about how good or bad a player is.
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: "Young Bronson" Leake masterful Next: The Leadoff Saga Continues |