Oboma homophobe ?
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
Prev: Tweet 5/11
Next: Wakamatstupid
From: McDuck on 12 May 2010 22:52 On Wed, 12 May 2010 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT), The Gnorkmeister <gnork(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >Kagan is so damn ugly I am surprised any guy would go out with her, >let alone marry her. Fine, so Obama did not name a babe to the court. Is that a criticism? Bush 43, of course, did not get into the issue of babes in robes b/c he appointed only RW white males (but he did propose Harriet Miers, who was not a distinguished lawyer --- I'll let you decide if she passed the babe test). > I just don't want another left wing Obama crony >in the court. Your side lost the election. Your side does not get to pick another right wing white male. That said, Kagan is about as far to the right as you and the RWKs could hope from a Democratic president.
From: The Gnorkmeister on 13 May 2010 01:21 On May 12, 7:52 pm, McDuck <wallyDELETEMEMcD...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2010 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT), The Gnorkmeister > > <gn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Kagan is so damn ugly I am surprised any guy would go out with her, > >let alone marry her. > > Fine, so Obama did not name a babe to the court. Is that a criticism? > Bush 43, of course, did not get into the issue of babes in robes b/c > he appointed only RW white males (but he did propose Harriet Miers, > who was not a distinguished lawyer --- I'll let you decide if she > passed the babe test). As usual you miss (or choose to ignore) the point entirely. The point is with her looks one cannot assume Lesbianism just because she isn't married. That would be true, although less so, if she was a babe. > > > I just don't want another left wing Obama crony > >in the court. > > Your side lost the election. Your side does not get to pick another > right wing white male. Fine, how about a right wing black, asian, hispanic or whatever, either male or female? Larry Elder would be a great pick. > > That said, Kagan is about as far to the right as you and the RWKs > could hope from a Democratic president. You may be correct here, and that is the problem. Where was her concern for the career prospects of her students or the fair treatment of prospective employers when she banned military recruiters? Hypocrite. Ugly hypocrite! Like Obummer, no friend of the military.
From: PatsSox on 13 May 2010 06:54 "The Gnorkmeister" <gnork(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message ... On May 12, 7:52 pm, McDuck <wallyDELETEMEMcD...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Wed, 12 May 2010 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT), The Gnorkmeister > > <gn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >Kagan is so damn ugly I am surprised any guy would go out with her, > >let alone marry her. > > Fine, so Obama did not name a babe to the court. Is that a criticism? > Bush 43, of course, did not get into the issue of babes in robes b/c > he appointed only RW white males (but he did propose Harriet Miers, > who was not a distinguished lawyer --- I'll let you decide if she > passed the babe test). As usual you miss (or choose to ignore) the point entirely. The point is with her looks one cannot assume Lesbianism just because she isn't married. That would be true, although less so, if she was a babe. > > > I just don't want another left wing Obama crony > >in the court. > > Your side lost the election. Your side does not get to pick another > right wing white male. Fine, how about a right wing black, asian, hispanic or whatever, either male or female? Larry Elder would be a great pick. > > That said, Kagan is about as far to the right as you and the RWKs > could hope from a Democratic president. You may be correct here, and that is the problem. Where was her concern for the career prospects of her students or the fair treatment of prospective employers when she banned military recruiters? Hypocrite. Ugly hypocrite! Like Obummer, no friend of the military. ----------------------------- Marriage. The line used to be, 'why would a man buy the cow when he can get the milk for free?'.... the question more and more women have been asking themselves over the last 40, or so, years is, 'why buy the whole pig when you can get a little sausage for free?'. In 2005, marriage rates in the US had declined 50% since 1970. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-07-18-cohabit-divorce_x.htm A lot of that decline is because people are deciding to live together rather than marry. Now if Kagan had met a man and they'd co-habitated... the right would go crazy over her lack of "family values". Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Banning military recruiters? It's more complicated and you probably know that. But you are content to spew right wing talking points rather than educate yourself. Jeff Sessions and Mitch McConnell would be so proud.
From: Tristan daCunha on 13 May 2010 08:14 One of Kagan's most telling personal habits is always leaving the toilet seat up! Comprende?
From: Tristan daCunha on 13 May 2010 08:10
Hey McQuack; How about Mark Levin? BTW, do you have a relative named Donald? Well, do you? |