From: ZZH770 on
On Wed, 12 May 2010 22:21:18 -0700 (PDT), The Gnorkmeister
<gnork(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>You may be correct here, and that is the problem. Where was her
>concern for the career prospects of her students or the fair treatment
>of prospective employers when she banned military recruiters?

You do realize that she did not ban miulitary recruiters.

They were still on campus recruiting during her tenture.

But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant..


From: NNH on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:54:16 -0400, McDuck
<wallyDELETEMEMcDuck(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> The campus is an open space --- anyone can enter, even
>you.
>
They even let Mr. Dude in.
From: zz18 on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:41:13 -0400, McDuck
<wallyDELETEMEMcDuck(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>Just for your information, many universities did what Harvard did ---
>banned prospective employers, including the US military, that had
>discrimination policies that violated the non-discrimination standards
>of the universities. KKK was also banned <g>.
It should be pointed out that while the military was using
discriminatory policies lijke don't ask don't tell the government was
slamming universities who took part in discriminatory policies.



> All Harvard did was not make their
>private interview rooms available to employers who would not promise
>not to discriminate based on race, religion, gender, sexual
>orientation, etc.
Didn't the military have a recruiting office nearby?

From: McDuck on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 16:04:34 -0400, zz18(a)zz.com wrote:

>On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:41:13 -0400, McDuck
><wallyDELETEMEMcDuck(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>>Just for your information, many universities did what Harvard did ---
>>banned prospective employers, including the US military, that had
>>discrimination policies that violated the non-discrimination standards
>>of the universities. KKK was also banned <g>.
>It should be pointed out that while the military was using
>discriminatory policies lijke don't ask don't tell the government was
>slamming universities who took part in discriminatory policies.
>
>
>
>> All Harvard did was not make their
>>private interview rooms available to employers who would not promise
>>not to discriminate based on race, religion, gender, sexual
>>orientation, etc.
>Didn't the military have a recruiting office nearby?

Perhaps. I don't know. But I know that it was easy for employers,
including military, to interview Harvard students.
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Tweet 5/11
Next: Wakamatstupid