Oboma homophobe ?
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
Prev: Tweet 5/11
Next: Wakamatstupid
From: Tristan daCunha on 13 May 2010 08:25 Andrea Dworkn was a babe, compared to Kagan.
From: McDuck on 13 May 2010 14:41 On Wed, 12 May 2010 22:21:18 -0700 (PDT), The Gnorkmeister <gnork(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> That said, Kagan is about as far to the right as you and the RWKs >> could hope from a Democratic president. > >You may be correct here, and that is the problem. Where was her >concern for the career prospects of her students or the fair treatment >of prospective employers when she banned military recruiters? >Hypocrite. Ugly hypocrite! Like Obummer, no friend of the military. > > Obama is a great friend of the military. I wish he were not, as I think the plan in afghanistan is misguided. what do you think he has done with the military that makes him not a friend? The pay raises were bad? Fixing their health care (a Bush scandal) was bad? Working to improve the situation for families of service people is bad? What, exactly? Just for your information, many universities did what Harvard did --- banned prospective employers, including the US military, that had discrimination policies that violated the non-discrimination standards of the universities. KKK was also banned <g>. That Harvard students and faculty promoted q ban on employers who would not sign the university's non-discrimination policy statement. They are opposed to rank discrimination against gays and discrimination against other groups as well. That is no surprise, and the dean at Harvard had almost nothing to do with the policy (other than doing the bidding of the faculty and students). Many conservatives oppose discrimination in employment based on sexual preference, as you may know. Why is such opposition a bad thing in your view? You need not worry about the students at Harvard who wanted to interview with the military. The common practice at all universities having the ban was for the military and other employers who would not pledge not to discriminate to set up an interview place at a nearby hotel and do the interviews there. All Harvard did was not make their private interview rooms available to employers who would not promise not to discriminate based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc. I had no problem, by the way, with the Harvard ban (private school entitled to their political views). But I opposed the ban at my university b/c I thought it was improper for a state university to ban the federal government from free access. One can debate the military policy (but I'll not do so here), but it was in accord with federal law, or so the courts have held.
From: bmoore on 13 May 2010 15:48 "The Gnorkmeister" <gn...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > Donald doesn't consider McDuck as part of the family. He is ashamed of > him. I guess that's because unlike some posters here, McDuck isn't cartoonish.
From: Tristan daCunha on 13 May 2010 15:40 The Gnorkster observed, "Donald doesn't consider McDuck as part of the family. He is ashamed of him." LOL! 15 yds Gnork, and loss of down! LOL!
From: Tristan daCunha on 13 May 2010 15:43
Ray Ray; You are still the greatest justification for abortion....or euthanasia! The booze will take care of you, soon enough! |