New Predictions?
in [Cincinnati Reds]
|
Prev: New Predictions?
Next: Gonzo To Braves!
From: john smith on 12 Jul 2010 15:29 Since we are at the half way point, maybe a little more. Here is a second chance to amend your predictions on the 2010 Reds. I stand by my 85 or did I say 86 wins, can't remember? That may be enough to win a weak division but I think the Cardinals win 87 or 88. Any key injury with the Cards or Reds could make the difference. I doubt either team will add a REAL difference maker via a trade. We shall see. I really think 88 is going to be the top number in this division.
From: Kommienezuspadt on 12 Jul 2010 16:04 I predict you will find the opportunity to complain about Harang more. ;^) "john smith" <eddygdvd(a)msn.com> wrote in message news:17870-4C3B6B9A-5519(a)baytvnwsxa002.msntv.msn.com... > Type your message here. > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 5273 (20100712) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5273 (20100712) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
From: Gregg on 13 Jul 2010 01:45 On Jul 12, 4:04 pm, "Kommienezuspadt" <NoS...(a)NoWay.com> wrote: > I predict you will find the opportunity to complain about Harang more. > > ;^) > I concur. ;-) All in fun. At the beginning of the season I said they would be .500 From the way this team has played....I don't see that happening. I'll say the Red's winning 88 games - which I would have never seen at the beginning of the season. The second half of the schedule is easier (supposedly) than the first half which should bode well. This Central race will go to the last week of the season and I wouldn't be surprised to see another one game playoff. Which leads to this, how do they determine who hosts the one game playoff? Head to head?
From: tom dunne on 13 Jul 2010 11:48 On Jul 13, 1:45 am, Gregg <gk...(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > On Jul 12, 4:04 pm, "Kommienezuspadt" <NoS...(a)NoWay.com> wrote:> I predict you will find the opportunity to complain about Harang more. > > > ;^) > > I concur. ;-) All in fun. > At the beginning of the season I said they would be .500 > > From the way this team has played....I don't see that happening. I'll > say the Red's winning 88 games - which I would have never seen at the > beginning of the season. The second half of the schedule is easier > (supposedly) than the first half which should bode well. This Central > race will go to the last week of the season and I wouldn't be > surprised to see another one game playoff. > > Which leads to this, how do they determine who hosts the one game > playoff? Head to head? Coin flip.
From: John Kasupski on 13 Jul 2010 14:42
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:29:46 -0700, eddygdvd(a)msn.com (john smith) wrote: >Since we are at the half way point, maybe a little more. Here is a >second chance to amend your predictions on the 2010 Reds. > >I stand by my 85 or did I say 86 wins, can't remember? In David's poll, you predicted 84-78. >That may be >enough to win a weak division but I think the Cardinals win 87 or 88. >Any key injury with the Cards or Reds could make the difference. I doubt >either team will add a REAL difference maker via a trade. We shall see. > >I really think 88 is going to be the top number in this division. I think the Reds will end up with 90 wins and the Fraudinals with 88. JK |