|
From: Duwop on 9 Mar 2010 14:47 It's bullshit, AT&T is close to straight up even. There's a large group in the middle ranked between 10->22 within a gnats' hair of each other. Let's not make excuses for management, the ballpark is NOT a factor. MLB Park Factors - 2009 RK PARK NAME 1 Yankee Stadium (New York, NY) 1.261 2 Angel Stadium of Anaheim (Anaheim, California) 1.220 3 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington (Arlington, Texas) 1.194 4 U.S. Cellular Field (Chicago, Illinois ) 1.193 5 Oriole Park at Camden Yards (Baltimore, Maryland) 1.185 6 Great American Ball Park (Cincinnati, Ohio) 1.176 7 Sun Life Stadium (Miami, Florida) 1.127 8 Mall of America Field (Minneapolis, Minnesota) 1.111 9 Coors Field (Denver, Colorado) 1.082 10 Miller Park (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) 1.069 11 Minute Maid Park (Houston, Texas) 1.065 12 Citi Field (New York, NY) 1.057 13 PNC Park (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) 1.054 14 Chase Field (Phoenix, Arizona) 1.042 15 Wrigley Field (Chicago, Illinois) 1.006 16 Citizens Bank Park (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) 1.005 17 Rogers Centre (Toronto, Ontario) 0.990 18 Comerica Park (Detroit, Michigan) 0.974 19 Nationals Park (Washington, D.C.) 0.970 AT&T Park (San Francisco, California) 0.970 21 Fenway Park (Boston, Massachusetts) 0.964 22 Tropicana Field (St. Petersburg, Florida) 0.939 23 Oakland Coliseum (Oakland, California) 0.927 24 Safeco Field (Seattle, Washington) 0.886 25 Dodger Stadium (Los Angeles, California) 0.876 26 Turner Field (Atlanta, Georgia) 0.861 27 Kauffman Stadium (Kansas City, Missouri) 0.761 28 Busch Stadium (St. Louis, Missouri) 0.736 29 Petco Park (San Diego, California) 0.721 30 Progressive Field (Cleveland, Ohio) 0.670 Glossary Park Factor compares the rate of stats at home vs. the rate of stats on the road. A rate higher than 1.000 favors the hitter. Below 1.000 favors the pitcher. Teams with home games in multiple stadiums list aggregate Park Factors.
From: nomisnala on 10 Mar 2010 01:39 On Mar 9, 2:47 pm, Duwop <tut...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > It's bullshit, AT&T is close to straight up even. There's a large > group in the middle ranked between 10->22 within a gnats' hair of each > other. > > Let's not make excuses for management, the ballpark is NOT a factor. > > MLB Park Factors - 2009 > > RK PARK NAME > 1 Yankee Stadium (New York, NY) 1.261 > 2 Angel Stadium of Anaheim (Anaheim, California) 1.220 > 3 Rangers Ballpark in Arlington (Arlington, Texas) 1.194 > 4 U.S. Cellular Field (Chicago, Illinois ) 1.193 > 5 Oriole Park at Camden Yards (Baltimore, Maryland) 1.185 > 6 Great American Ball Park (Cincinnati, Ohio) 1.176 > 7 Sun Life Stadium (Miami, Florida) 1.127 > 8 Mall of America Field (Minneapolis, Minnesota) 1.111 > 9 Coors Field (Denver, Colorado) 1.082 > 10 Miller Park (Milwaukee, Wisconsin) 1.069 > 11 Minute Maid Park (Houston, Texas) 1.065 > 12 Citi Field (New York, NY) 1.057 > 13 PNC Park (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) 1.054 > 14 Chase Field (Phoenix, Arizona) 1.042 > 15 Wrigley Field (Chicago, Illinois) 1.006 > 16 Citizens Bank Park (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) 1.005 > 17 Rogers Centre (Toronto, Ontario) 0.990 > 18 Comerica Park (Detroit, Michigan) 0.974 > 19 Nationals Park (Washington, D.C.) 0.970 > AT&T Park (San Francisco, California) 0.970 > 21 Fenway Park (Boston, Massachusetts) 0.964 > 22 Tropicana Field (St. Petersburg, Florida) 0.939 > 23 Oakland Coliseum (Oakland, California) 0.927 > 24 Safeco Field (Seattle, Washington) 0.886 > 25 Dodger Stadium (Los Angeles, California) 0.876 > 26 Turner Field (Atlanta, Georgia) 0.861 > 27 Kauffman Stadium (Kansas City, Missouri) 0.761 > 28 Busch Stadium (St. Louis, Missouri) 0.736 > 29 Petco Park (San Diego, California) 0.721 > 30 Progressive Field (Cleveland, Ohio) 0.670 > > Glossary > Park Factor compares the rate of stats at home vs. the rate of stats > on the road. A rate higher than 1.000 favors the hitter. Below 1.000 > favors the pitcher. Teams with home games in multiple stadiums list > aggregate Park Factors. How has Mays Field ranked over the last 4 or 5 years? I wonder if stratified for lefties vs righties, if the park effects would be plate side specific.
From: Peter Lawrence on 10 Mar 2010 03:06 On 3/9/10 10:39 PM, nomisnala wrote: > > How has Mays Field ranked over the last 4 or 5 years? > I wonder if stratified for lefties vs righties, if the park effects > would be plate side specific. They are. AT&T Park isn't bad at all for right-handed power hitters of all stripes. AT&T Park is awful though for left-handed power-alley hitters. But for left-handed power hitters who can strongly pull the ball down the right-field line like Barry Bonds, Todd Helton, or Luis Gonzalez it wasn't bad either. - Peter
|
Pages: 1 Prev: A great happiness fell upon the land Next: where are all the giants posts? |