Prev: Cortisone shot anyone ???
Next: Josh Bard
From: Gary on 23 Jul 2010 19:38 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:39:38 -0400, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> He would have pitched more if the no hitter was still alive. > >Since for that to happen, he would have still been pitching well...I suppose >so. Rightly too. > If they weren't going to pull Buchholz when he was throwing his no-hitter, I don't think they would even consider pulling Lackey until he gives up a hit.
From: Dano on 23 Jul 2010 20:05
"Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:us9k46potte4jp2264t50hmm959stnpuao(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:39:38 -0400, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> He would have pitched more if the no hitter was still alive. > > > >Since for that to happen, he would have still been pitching well...I suppose > >so. Rightly too. > > > > If they weren't going to pull Buchholz when he was throwing his > no-hitter, I don't think they would even consider pulling Lackey until > he gives up a hit. Not the point. His pitch count was not too high. The only real reason to pull him was he was losing effectiveness. |