From: Gary on
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:39:38 -0400, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:


>>
>> He would have pitched more if the no hitter was still alive.
>
>Since for that to happen, he would have still been pitching well...I suppose
>so. Rightly too.
>

If they weren't going to pull Buchholz when he was throwing his
no-hitter, I don't think they would even consider pulling Lackey until
he gives up a hit.
From: Dano on

"Gary" <golferace2(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:us9k46potte4jp2264t50hmm959stnpuao(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:39:38 -0400, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> >>
> >> He would have pitched more if the no hitter was still alive.
> >
> >Since for that to happen, he would have still been pitching well...I
suppose
> >so. Rightly too.
> >
>
> If they weren't going to pull Buchholz when he was throwing his
> no-hitter, I don't think they would even consider pulling Lackey until
> he gives up a hit.

Not the point. His pitch count was not too high. The only real reason to
pull him was he was losing effectiveness.


First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Cortisone shot anyone ???
Next: Josh Bard