Ft. Hood
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
Prev: Rules Changes
Next: Funny, Regardless of Politics
From: Dano on 7 Nov 2009 12:37 DW wrote: > Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were > shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in > firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) > > 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really.
From: Ray O'Hara on 7 Nov 2009 13:41 "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > DW wrote: >> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were >> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in >> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) >> >> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. > > One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he > was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for > private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so > it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. > Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went > astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. > he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal.
From: Gnork on 7 Nov 2009 15:20 On Nov 7, 10:41 am, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "Dano" <janeandd...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > DW wrote: > >> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were > >> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in > >> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) > > >> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. > > > One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he > > was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for > > private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so > > it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. > > Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went > > astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. > > he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. He also fired over 100 rounds according to reports. He gave plenty of prior indications that he was a nut case, yet nobody did anything about him. That is what they really need to investigate.
From: Tristan daCunha on 7 Nov 2009 18:15 The Gnorkster said, "He also fired over 100 rounds according to reports. He gave plenty of prior indications that he was a nut case, yet nobody did anything about him. That is what they really need to investigate." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ His name wasn't Brian Pratt, was it?
From: Tristan daCunha on 7 Nov 2009 18:12
Dano Gir; It's called "trolling" and it's a left wing CS who is doing it. You, of all people, know that! |