Ft. Hood
in [Boston Red Sox]
|
Prev: Rules Changes
Next: Funny, Regardless of Politics
From: Dano on 7 Nov 2009 18:33 "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hd4f18$hrf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > DW wrote: > >> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were > >> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in > >> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) > >> > >> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. > > > > One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he > > was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for > > private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so > > it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. > > Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went > > astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. > > > > he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. > The ammo that pierces armor IS. Try to keep up. Military personnel would have a much easier time getting hold of it however I'm sure.
From: Ray O'Hara on 7 Nov 2009 19:23 "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hd5055$omp$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:hd4f18$hrf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> > DW wrote: >> >> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were >> >> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in >> >> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) >> >> >> >> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. >> > >> > One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he >> > was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal > for >> > private citizens, but available to someone in the military > certainly...so >> > it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. >> > Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went >> > astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. >> > >> >> he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. >> > > The ammo that pierces armor IS. Try to keep up. Military personnel would > have a much easier time getting hold of it however I'm sure. > > AP bullets are legal too. and I haven't heard definitivley that he had those. just the press making their usual heyperbolic scare mongering. "Actual possession by the "law-abiding" citizens is not "banned" for "sporting purposes," such as target shooting and such. Purchase is restricted to dealers, and must be purchased from licensed manufacturers and importers described above. Sales is controlled by other FFL dealers and licensed collectors who must keep a detailed log book or "acquisition and disposition" (A&D) book similar to a manufacture/dealer's A & D (Firearm(s) Acquisition & Disposition) Book."
From: S/B 954RR on 7 Nov 2009 22:10 "Gnork" <gnork(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:7d33533a-c0ad-4d4b-857c-05a5d7cf8ebc(a)x6g2000prc.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 7, 10:41 am, "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-oh...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> "Dano" <janeandd...(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message >> >> news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> >> > DW wrote: >> >> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were >> >> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in >> >> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) >> >> >> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. >> >> > One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he >> > was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal >> > for >> > private citizens, but available to someone in the military >> > certainly...so >> > it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. >> > Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went >> > astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. >> >> he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. > > He also fired over 100 rounds according to reports. He gave plenty of > prior indications that he was a nut case, yet nobody did anything > about him. That is what they really need to investigate. As soon as he praised Allah (according to reports) someone should have emptied a magazine in his head. There had to be someone with a weapon. I know he chose areas where people would normally be unarmed but someone had to have a weapon nearby.
From: S/B 954RR on 7 Nov 2009 22:12 "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hd4f18$hrf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> DW wrote: >>> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were >>> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in >>> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) >>> >>> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. >> >> One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he >> was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for >> private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so >> it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. >> Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went >> astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. >> > > he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. > > Cite please. National Enquirer? I saw at the check out counter that Oprah is paying her ex $150M to keep his mouth shut, still believe you can 'book it'?
From: Dano on 8 Nov 2009 01:18
"S/B 954RR" <jtibbs08(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:7lmr9lF3f17vtU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > "Ray O'Hara" <raymond-ohara(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:hd4f18$hrf$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > > > "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:hd4b7q$j6g$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > >> DW wrote: > >>> Seems that a number of the people shot at Ft. Hood were > >>> shot by friendly fire. Think about it: this guy does in > >>> firing two guns (20 bullets each, he didn't ge tto reload.) > >>> > >>> 47 are hit, so the math says 7 had to have been hit by friendly fire. > >> > >> One of those guns was quite the weapon. We don't know yet what ammo he > >> was using but it is capable of firing armor piercing rounds...illegal for > >> private citizens, but available to someone in the military certainly...so > >> it actually is concievable he could have hit more than one per shot. > >> Having said that, it would not be very surprising that many shots went > >> astray. I don't see the point of even bringing it up really. > >> > > > > he bought it over the counter at a gun shop. its not illegal. > > > > > > Cite please. National Enquirer? I saw at the check out counter that Oprah > is paying her ex $150M to keep his mouth shut, still believe you can 'book > it'? > http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2009/11/07/2009-11-07_ft_hood_shooter_nidal_hasan_used_private_legallybought_pistol__not_military_weap.html http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33745355/ns/us_news-tragedy_at_fort_hood/ |