Prev: Would You Join A New NG??
Next: Tweet 8/10
From: sweet lou on 7 Aug 2010 17:16
On Aug 7, 5:00 pm, Giovanni Wassen <exta...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> sweet lou wrote:
> > The original post was to see how many if any had any interest in a new/
> > different NG. From some responses there appears to be some confusion.
>
> The real confusion is actually you confusing something provided by Google
> and calling it a NG. Usenet isn't Google.
>
> What spam and what trolls? If you'd simply stopped using Google Groups and
> start using a decent news reader with a working killfile you wouldn't need
> another group.
>
> --
> Gio
>
> http://www.animeblog.nl

Right on technical point but it serves the same purpose. It appears
many folks in this "NG" don't use a newsreader, but the point is well
taken.
From: DonFromBarre on 7 Aug 2010 18:41
Lou says:
<<Right on technical point but it serves the same purpose. It appears
many folks in this "NG" don't use a newsreader, but the point is well
taken. >>

Certainly I understand your frustration with the political garbage Lou
but ANY sort of a moderated group would smack of censorship for me. I
just generally ignore the most offensive OT people like Dan and only
"play" with Trissie when I have a moment of weakness.

--
I've been told that I
be not strange!!!
I simply be DON!!!
And most days
that be enough!!!




From: O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Palin: The Anti-Obama on 7 Aug 2010 19:26
On Aug 7, 12:04 pm, sweet lou <lounanmar...(a)aol.com> wrote:
> The original post was to see how many if any had any interest in a new/
> different NG. From some responses there appears to be some confusion.
> I'll try to clarify:This is no intented to be a elitist group it would
> encompass 95% of the folks in this NG. It would not be moderated thus
> no censorship per se your 1st admendment rights would be in tact i.e.
> you could as you can now express yourself as you wished. What it would
> do is initially shut out all spam, the likes of Girly Girl, as well as
> known trolls be they Yankee or otherwise although sensible posters of
> other teams would be welcome, those that post political posts on a
> regular basis would not be welcome. Because it would not be moderated
> Any say again ANY OT posts would be accepted.Due to the eliminating of
> the consistent political posters it would minimize such posts. The
> operative word is minimize but not ban.Now this just an idea set forth
> to judge the reaction pro or con. Who would make the judgement as to
> gets in? That's a damn good question I would be glad to have any
> "regulars" volunteer to help in making the decision(s). This is just
> an idea which may or may not come to fruition so if you decide to
> flame me for making such a suggestion go ahead.

RUN, COWARD!!!
:D
From: PR1 on 7 Aug 2010 20:22
On 07 Aug 2010 21:00:47 GMT, Giovanni Wassen <extatix(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>The real confusion is actually you confusing something provided by Google
>and calling it a NG. Usenet isn't Google.
Actually usenet is Google. The old Deja archives reverted to google.



From: Tristan daCunha on 7 Aug 2010 21:19
Oh Don;That gets me excited! <eye roll>

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Would You Join A New NG??
Next: Tweet 8/10