Prev: Gnork and McDuck were right
Next: Yanls-Mets on TBS
From: Ray Garraty on 19 Jun 2010 11:45
On Jun 19, 9:28 am, Polarhound <polarho...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> Cut and pasted exactly as it appears, including formatting:
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/letter-president-g-20-leaders
>
> "For our part, we will pursue measures to SUppOit the recovery in
> private demand and return the unemployed to work. At the same time, we
> recognize the impoltance of setting a credible medium-term fiscal path:
> that is why my Administration will cut the budget deficit we inherited
> in halfby FY 2013 and work to reduce our fiscal deficit to 3 percent
> ofGDP by FY 2015, which will stabilize the
> debt-to-GDP ratio at an acceptable level in that year."
>
> "To support the recovery and strengthen the ability of our financial
> systems to deliver needed credit, we must maintain the momentum of
> financial repair. Resolving ongoing uncertainty about the transparency
> of bank balance sheets and the adequacy of bank capital, patticularly in
> Europe, will help reduce financial market volatility and the cost of
> borrowing. We should SUppOlt efforts to enhance transparency and
> increase disclosure by our large financial institutions and to act,
> where necessary, to strengthen the capital position of our banks. Our
> ability to grow
> without the excesses that that put our economies at risk two years ago
> requires that we accelerate our efforts to bring needed financial
> refolIDs to completion. In the U.S., both houses of Congress have passed
> comprehensive financial regulatory refOlID bills. We must reiterate our
> commitment in Toronto to a common framework for reforms that provide:"
>
> "more effective ji'Qlllework for winding down large global firms, along
> with principles for thefillallcial sector to make afair and substantial
> contribution towards payingfor allY burdens it creates in a way that
> protects taxpayers, creates a level playing field, and reduces risks to
> our economies."
>
> "I look fOlward to seeing you in Toronto and reaffhming our unity of
> purpose and resolve."

Wow, that's a Code Red, Earth shattering development there. Errors
in Text formatting. Did you call Homeland Security?

Reuters published the actual version yesterday.
From: bmoore on 19 Jun 2010 21:11
On Jun 19, 11:05 am, mario in victoria <mario5...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Polarhound wrote:
> > Cut and pasted exactly as it appears, including formatting:
>
> >http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/letter-president-g-20-leaders
>
> > "For our part, we will pursue measures to SUppOit the recovery in
> > private demand and return the unemployed to work. At the same time, we
> > recognize the impoltance of setting a credible medium-term fiscal path:
> > that is why my Administration will cut the budget deficit we inherited
> > in halfby FY 2013 and work to reduce our fiscal deficit to 3 percent
> > ofGDP by FY 2015, which will stabilize the
> > debt-to-GDP ratio at an acceptable level in that year."
>
> > "To support the recovery and strengthen the ability of our financial
> > systems to deliver needed credit, we must maintain the momentum of
> > financial repair. Resolving ongoing uncertainty about the transparency
> > of bank balance sheets and the adequacy of bank capital, patticularly in
> > Europe, will help reduce financial market volatility and the cost of
> > borrowing. We should SUppOlt efforts to enhance transparency and
> > increase disclosure by our large financial institutions and to act,
> > where necessary, to strengthen the capital position of our banks. Our
> > ability to grow
> > without the excesses that that put our economies at risk two years ago
> > requires that we accelerate our efforts to bring needed financial
> > refolIDs to completion. In the U.S., both houses of Congress have passed
> > comprehensive financial regulatory refOlID bills. We must reiterate our
> > commitment in Toronto to a common framework for reforms that provide:"
>
> > "more effective ji'Qlllework for winding down large global firms, along
> > with principles for thefillallcial sector to make afair and substantial
> > contribution towards payingfor allY burdens it creates in a way that
> > protects taxpayers, creates a level playing field, and reduces risks to
> > our economies."
>
> > "I look fOlward to seeing you in Toronto and reaffhming our unity of
> > purpose and resolve."
>
> Reads like a Bush missive.
> What's your point?
>
> mario in victoria
> --
> nit, nit, nit

His point is that he can't find anything substantial to complain
about. Funny though, that he chose to assail Obama, who by all
appearances is a literate man, whatever you think of his politics. His
predecessor, while probably a decent fellow, came across as a near-
idiot in that respect. At least to those of us who are literate.

From: PETER SHORTS on 26 Jun 2010 11:23
On Jun 26, 10:52 am, Polarhound <polarho...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> bmo...(a)nyx.net wrote:
> > Every administration does bonehead things at times.
>
> Had the original letter been posted online by Bush, there would have
> Quayle jokes, Bushtard commentary, references to 'stupid hick southerns'
> and various other things you can likely easily think of.
>
> Instead, because it was Obama, the ridiculers have turned into
> apologists for this Quayle-esqe mess.  Their hypocrisy has been
> magnified many times over as a result.

are you saying that no one is making fun of this because it's obama?
you started this thread in order to make fun of it, so obviously
there's some ridicule going on here.
From: O'Neil's Faggy Prostate - Obambi Sucks. on 26 Jun 2010 20:06
On Jun 26, 10:23 am, PETER SHORTS <petersh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> are you saying that no one is making fun of this because it's obama?

No, just his waterboys - the MSM.

From: bmoore on 27 Jun 2010 01:05
On Jun 26, 8:23 am, PETER SHORTS <petersh...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jun 26, 10:52 am, Polarhound <polarho...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > bmo...(a)nyx.net wrote:
> > > Every administration does bonehead things at times.
>
> > Had the original letter been posted online by Bush, there would have
> > Quayle jokes, Bushtard commentary, references to 'stupid hick southerns'
> > and various other things you can likely easily think of.
>
> > Instead, because it was Obama, the ridiculers have turned into
> > apologists for this Quayle-esqe mess.  Their hypocrisy has been
> > magnified many times over as a result.
>
> are you saying that no one is making fun of this because it's obama?
> you started this thread in order to make fun of it, so obviously
> there's some ridicule going on here.

How libtard of you to demand a semblance of consistency :-)
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Gnork and McDuck were right
Next: Yanls-Mets on TBS