From: Tristan daCunha on 28 Jan 2010 10:40 Hey Gnorker; Whadaya mean "former"?
From: Tristan daCunha on 28 Jan 2010 10:46 Dano; You oughta' know about having a bone thrown to...
From: McDuck on 28 Jan 2010 21:00 On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:56:56 -0500, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> wrote: >McDuck wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:46:18 -0500, "Dano" <janeanddano(a)yahoo.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Bull. This would only make the Democrats look worse. The voters >>> spoke regardless of what we think. You have to honor the vote. To >>> do otherwise would only damage the party further. Filibusters are a >>> legal part of the process. It never should have reached this point. >>> Blame the Democrats for the arrogance to assume they would retain >>> that power indefinitely. This bill isn't worth destroying any >>> credibility the Democrats still may have. In fact it's far from >>> perfect. I for one have a lot of problems with it and only felt it >>> was better than nothing as a start. They need to get back to work >>> on a better option. The Repubs and the various lobbies may come to >>> rue this day down the line. I'm convinced the insurers secretly >>> wanted this to pass. >>> >> >> Big pharma may be secretly supporting the bill, but not the insurance >> companies. They gain from added coverage, but almost everything else >> is stuff they do not like. Of course, with the public option, the >> insurance companies would face a different situation, which is why >> they worked so hard against it. > >My guess is they understand that the public option could gain momentum if >nothing passed. They'll never admit it, but this plan is not that bad for >them. Better to throw people some kind of a bone. > Yes, that is fairly likely. It is tough in some respects on the insurance industry, but not nearly as tough as it might be.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: احصل على ماستر كارد MasterCard مجانا وتوصلك إلى بيتك Next: Tsunami warning |