Prev: Win Tomorrow
Next: Brandon Phillips
From: David Short on 5 May 2010 10:47
On 5/4/2010 9:57 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Neither Bruce nor Kearns have been significantly
> above average, but in the long run very few
> arms have significant impact.

I'm not surprised that Kearns arm doesn't show up in the data, but it
was there at one time.

I'm a little puzzled that Bruce doesn't show up.

dfs
From: Ron Johnson on 5 May 2010 14:47
On May 5, 10:47 am, David Short
<David.No.Sho...(a)Spam.wright.Please.edu> wrote:
> On 5/4/2010 9:57 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > Neither Bruce nor Kearns have been significantly
> > above average, but in the long run very few
> > arms have significant impact.
>
> I'm not surprised that Kearns arm doesn't show up in the data, but it
> was there at one time.
>
> I'm a little puzzled that Bruce doesn't show up.

You have to understand that 3 runs per 162 games over the long run
run would be excellent.

And hard to notice in the limited time Bruce has been around.
That'd be what ... around 5 runs so far. It's possible for
Bruce to grade out as both "pretty good" and "not significant"
given his playing time.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Win Tomorrow
Next: Brandon Phillips