From: john smith on 8 Oct 2009 16:52 Come on Bob, Dunn and Arizona for 5 weeks, I don't think that Arizona and a winning team had anything to do with Dunn being there...... I don't want to start another Dunn diatribe post here but him and Kearns have played for nothing but 5th or 6th place teams their whole career. You underrate attitude as a factor in winning. Sure attitude in no way comes close to talent as far as winning is concerned. I am just saying when you get used to losing, it is a hard habit to break. Especially if the losing is perpetual and especially if the losing always seems to put you out of the race after your first stretch of adversity.... The " here we go again" attitude is very easy to have when you have never won anything....I always got a kick out of that psychiatrist who came and talked the team and kept telling them "losing is a disease". Silly idiotic movie but funny at times... I am a firm believer that team chemistry and a winning attitude go a long way for any successful baseball franchise. The Yankees seem to have those ingredients down to the T.... this year. It is a very happy clubhouse despite the Jorge controversy...
From: Bob Braun on 8 Oct 2009 17:27 "john smith" <eddygdvd(a)msn.com> wrote in message news:17008-4ACE5124-7830(a)baytvnwsxa002.msntv.msn.com... > Come on Bob, Dunn and Arizona for 5 weeks, I don't think that Arizona > and a winning team had anything to do with Dunn being there...... If Arizona doesn't count, then your sample size is a grand total of 2 teams. The common denominator, better yet, the lowest common denominator being Jim Bowden.
From: John Kasupski on 8 Oct 2009 18:23 On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 02:23:12 -0400, "Bob Braun" <oxinfla(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >As far as Kearns goes, I think his problems are based on lack of effort. I was going to say more about Kearns but I ended up cutting it out. However, looking back...he has what is basically a brilliant minor league career, where he was looked at by some in the Reds' organization as a better prospect than Dunn was. He comes up to the Reds and actually has a decent rookie year, finishing third in ROTY voting. Then injuries handcuffed him for a couple of years, and then he gets traded in mid-season, from one losing team to another one that just happens to be MLB's modern-day equivalent of the '62 Mets. While you'd like to see a guy keep battling and fight his way through all that and rise to the top like cream is supposed to do, I can understand it if that affected him mentally. What was that Berra-ism, 50% of baseball is 90% mental or something like that? So...yeah, when I was writing that post, it did occur to me to wonder if part of the reason for Kearns' decline was because, playing for a perennial league doormat, he just doesn't give a bleep anymore. He wasn't nearly an all-star his first full year in Washington; he wasn't horrible either. But the two seasons that have elapsed since...pretty ugly. JK
From: John Kasupski on 8 Oct 2009 18:25 On Thu, 8 Oct 2009 16:31:29 -0400, "Bob Braun" <oxinfla(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Both players were coveted by leather pants. The only correlation I see >relative to Kearns/Dunn and losers is Jim Bowden. Yeah, but that in itself speaks volumes. JK
From: David Short on 9 Oct 2009 09:47 john smith wrote: > I am a firm believer that team chemistry and a winning attitude go a > long way for any successful baseball franchise. The Yankees seem to have > those ingredients down to the T.... this year. That and spending 200+ million a year on the best talent money can buy. dfs
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Reds renew all coaches except........... Next: 4 Best Records Move On |