From: Leonard on

"Jon Rossen" <jonr17(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:i37k72$c47$1(a)news.albasani.net...
> John Walsh wrote:

>> If the Bum beat the Pads, the Giants pick up 1/2 a game. They'll off
>> due to travel to play the Rocks in Colorado. The Giants seem to be
>> relentless now. It's a muich different team from last year, even the
>> first half of this year.
>
> I'm not getting too excited just yet. This team has a history of dashing
> hopes....
>
> Tonite is one night I'm glad I have my MLB.TV account--Dodgers/Padres will
> be on. I just wish there was a way that both teams could lose.

There is. Four Dodger-Padre games in a row that go to extra innings and
crush the pitching staffs of both teams.


From: Jon Rossen on
Leonard wrote:
> "Jon Rossen" <jonr17(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:i37k72$c47$1(a)news.albasani.net...
>> John Walsh wrote:
>
>>> If the Bum beat the Pads, the Giants pick up 1/2 a game. They'll off
>>> due to travel to play the Rocks in Colorado. The Giants seem to be
>>> relentless now. It's a muich different team from last year, even the
>>> first half of this year.
>> I'm not getting too excited just yet. This team has a history of dashing
>> hopes....
>>
>> Tonite is one night I'm glad I have my MLB.TV account--Dodgers/Padres will
>> be on. I just wish there was a way that both teams could lose.
>
> There is. Four Dodger-Padre games in a row that go to extra innings and
> crush the pitching staffs of both teams.
>
>

Oh yeah I realize that...but those are indirect loses. I was hoping for
something like *direct* loses for both teams for each game of the
series. But because of how the rules are written that is impossible. <g>

I'm watching the game right now....Dodger offensive woes seems to be
continuing....runners on 1st and 2nd with one out and they couldn't even
advance the runners. Oh well, even if the Padres win at least it will
be one more shovel full of dirt on the Dodger's chances.

-jon rossen
From: John Walsh on
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:26:24 -0700, Jon Rossen <jonr17(a)comcast.net>
wrote:

>John Walsh wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:14:13 +0200, SS <s.s(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2010-08-02 07:21:59 +0200, John Walsh said:
>>>
>>>> San Diego 61 42
>>>> San Fran 61 45 1.5 GB
>>>> Colorado 55 50 7.0 GB
>>>> LA Dodgers 54 51 8.0 GB
>>>> Arizona 39 66 23.0 GB
>>>>
>>>> Sweet!
>>> And tonight the Bums will be out for blood against the Pads. Pretty
>>> much a win-win situation from where I stand. If the Bums win the the
>>> Giants have a chance to advance on the Pads for Division title, and if
>>> the Pads win the the Dodgers are pushed further into the dirt.
>>>
>>> SS
>>
>> If the Bum beat the Pads, the Giants pick up 1/2 a game. They'll off
>> due to travel to play the Rocks in Colorado. The Giants seem to be
>> relentless now. It's a muich different team from last year, even the
>> first half of this year.
>
>I'm not getting too excited just yet. This team has a history of
>dashing hopes....
>
>Tonite is one night I'm glad I have my MLB.TV account--Dodgers/Padres
>will be on. I just wish there was a way that both teams could lose.
>
>-jon rossen

Don't sweat it, jon. The Padres are slaughtering the Dodgers. The
Dodgers can't do anything right.
From: NFN Smith on
Leonard wrote:
..
>>
>> Tonite is one night I'm glad I have my MLB.TV account--Dodgers/Padres will
>> be on. I just wish there was a way that both teams could lose.
>
> There is. Four Dodger-Padre games in a row that go to extra innings and
> crush the pitching staffs of both teams.

*Lots* of extra innings. And the teams split the series.

I was going to suggest that when I see something like this in football,
I root for a scoreless tie to be decided on a safety in overtime.

Smith

From: Greg Lentz on
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:49:40 -0700, NFN Smith <worldoff9908(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Leonard wrote:
>.
>>>
>>> Tonite is one night I'm glad I have my MLB.TV account--Dodgers/Padres will
>>> be on. I just wish there was a way that both teams could lose.
>>
>> There is. Four Dodger-Padre games in a row that go to extra innings and
>> crush the pitching staffs of both teams.
>
>*Lots* of extra innings. And the teams split the series.

Technically, I think at this point we'd probably prefer the Dodgers to
sweep the Padres so that the Giants could gain ground on the Padres
(ignoring the fact that for all I know, the Padres could be going on a
long losing streak and the Dodgers on a long winning streak in the near
future).
--
Greg Lentz